From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Unchecked_Union record inside an other record - trouble Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2014 22:56:16 +0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: AnnUDmZwVERVUXyHDyOl5A.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21572 Date: 2014-08-08T22:56:16+03:00 List-Id: Shark8 wrote: > On 08-Aug-14 10:56, Victor Porton wrote: >> >> But it is a hack. > > How are you going to be able to tell which variant the subcomponent is > though? The C union *doesn't* tag the varying part, so that information > has to be kept elsewhere... or ignored completely. For records interfacing with C it SHOULD be ignored completely. Because it is C. >> I propose to change ARM not to require a discriminant in this specific >> case (Unchecked_Union). > > No. > Just no. > What you propose here would import from C weak typing -- if you want > weak typing, why re you using Ada? I want weak typing on request, to interface with C, but remaining in Ada. -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org