From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT 4.9 - missing optimization feature? Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 17:35:27 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <77c54c0b-ad0a-46f7-9fd9-dc6b1806b116@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 15:35:30 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="23dab0694e4174fdc880833ec67fa650"; logging-data="9632"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/BkhwllscKy7F7rFuipTip" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0 In-Reply-To: <77c54c0b-ad0a-46f7-9fd9-dc6b1806b116@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:gpJyebso02OHuBwSRyUEaFZgoGg= X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21488 Date: 2014-08-06T17:35:27+02:00 List-Id: Le 06/08/2014 17:16, Adam Beneschan a écrit : >> So what's the point? > The point is that code *could* be generated not to call Adjust in the T1 case, but GNAT doesn't do so. Yes, but I was asking the OP, where he assumed that the non-existent adjust was not called due to optimization... -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr