From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: GNAT 4.9 - missing optimization feature? Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 01:55:01 +0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: AnnUDmZwVERVUXyHDyOl5A.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21472 Date: 2014-08-06T01:55:01+03:00 List-Id: The below program, compiled with GNAT 4.9, calls Adjust two times when copying a T1 object. But it does the same operations with a T2 object without calling Adjust. So calling Adjust on a T1 object is here redundant and can be optimized away for greater performance. If I recall correctly, Ada Reference Manual allows this kind of optimization. So GNAT is not as good as I expected, isn't it? with Ada.Finalization; with Ada.Text_IO; procedure Main is type T1 is new Ada.Finalization.Controlled with null record; type T2 is new Ada.Finalization.Limited_Controlled with null record; overriding procedure Adjust(Object: in out T1) is begin Ada.Text_IO.Put_Line("Adjust"); end; function F return T1 is begin return (Ada.Finalization.Controlled with null record); end; function F return T2 is begin return (Ada.Finalization.Limited_Controlled with null record); end; X: T1 := F; Y: T2 := F; begin null; end; -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org