From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: A bad counterintuitive behaviour of Ada about OO
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:11:33 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lrrha0$6mh$3@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <lrrdm1$u6n$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <932kntuq5rrr.8sumwibqrufn.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: AnnUDmZwVERVUXyHDyOl5A.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21467
Date: 2014-08-06T00:11:33+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:

> On Tue, 05 Aug 2014 23:09:40 +0300, Victor Porton wrote:
> 
>> Why Ada behaves in this counter-intuitive way?
> 
> Because it is C++ code written in Ada.
> 
>> What should I do in similar situations when developing real Ada software?
> 
> Never re-dispatch, never cast types, unless you exactly know what are you
> doing.

Your answer is "negative". You say what not to do.

But I am seeking a positive answer: what should I do in this situation, when 
writing real software?

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org