From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: On packages hierarchy
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:41:19 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lr5jtt$dpo$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rFX7cZOSaeuGGZI2vwQTaQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21308
Date: 2014-07-28T16:41:19+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I am going to create the package RDF.Raptor.Iostream which would be Ada 
bindings around
http://librdf.org/raptor/api/raptor2-section-iostream.html

Afterward, I am going to create Ada IO stream (derived from 
Root_Stream_Type) which encaspulates (wraps) RDF.Raptor.Iostream and 
reversely RDF.Raptor.Iostream which encaspulates (wraps) Root_Stream_Type.

Should packages which wrap each other be in child packages of 
RDF.Raptor.Iostream? I think no, because they do not require access to 
internals (private part) of RDF.Raptor.Iostream but child packages have 
access to private parts.

So, should they be siblings, like RDF.Raptor.Iostream_To_Ada and 
RDF.Raptor.Iostream_From_Ada? (Also please help to conceive good names for 
these packages.)

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org