From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Should thick bindings throw an exception?
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2014 19:07:56 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lr384q$kgn$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rFX7cZOSaeuGGZI2vwQTaQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:187940
Date: 2014-07-27T19:07:56+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Should a thick bindings of a C function, which returns non-0 on failure,
instead throw an exception on failure?

By the way, should I define a new exception or use one of language pre-
defined exception?

The description of the C function follows:

int raptor_uri_print (const raptor_uri *uri, FILE *stream);

Print a URI to a file handle.

uri :
	URI to print

stream :
	The file handle to print to

Returns :
	non-0 on failure

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org