From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: What should be convention C?
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 19:34:17 +0300
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <lqrcib$77l$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: rFX7cZOSaeuGGZI2vwQTaQ.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21188
Date: 2014-07-24T19:34:17+03:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Suppose we need to interface a procedure C_Procedure which receives a 
pointer to a record C_Record.

Is Convention=>C needed for both of the below? Or just to one (which?)

type C_Record is
   record
      A: unsigned;
      B: unsigned;
   end record
     with Convention=>C;

procedure C_Procedure(X: access C_Record)
  with Convention=>C;

-- 
Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org