From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Should be in the root package or its child? Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 22:02 +0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: rFX7cZOSaeuGGZI2vwQTaQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21162 Date: 2014-07-23T22:02:00+03:00 List-Id: Victor Porton wrote: > I am writing thick (object oriented) bindings for Raptor RDF Syntax > Library (libraptor2). > > Should I put World_Type (used by almost every program which uses my > library) into the root package of my library or into some its child > package? > > I think that it depends on the "size" (number of primitive routines, > roughly saying) associated with World_Type. If it is small, I should keep > it in the root package, and if it is big to "allocate" a new subunit. > > Other criteria or other opinions? Some more entities are associated with World_Type: Flag_Type (an enumeration) Flag_And_Value (a record) type Flags_Array is array(Integer range <>) of Flag_And_Value; -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org