From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6df8f8501cf7275
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
X-Received: by 10.180.24.130 with SMTP id u2mr10320536wif.6.1357120830058;
        Wed, 02 Jan 2013 02:00:30 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 i11ni347135wiw.0!nntp.google.com!goblin3!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Easiest way to build Qt/Gtk interfaces for Ada programs
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:00:27 +0100
Organization: cbb software GmbH
Message-ID: <lqnqb4l1rsah$.araypvczws56.dlg@40tude.net>
References: <d97561e7-d327-4fe8-b75b-e74e385a0603@googlegroups.com>
 <cb2af317-8ef0-48a5-8031-2fd17d07866a@googlegroups.com>
 <87072854-0f81-41fd-8cb0-ede78fccf6e7@googlegroups.com>
 <52aed30c-1fd3-407e-be52-2c366b9002d6@googlegroups.com>
 <49ad97eb-fac1-49f0-a4ea-2dd79fa803d0@googlegroups.com>
 <kblel6$c16$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <4f9f0be9-7c11-4499-8c6d-1a56ed6e4f3c@googlegroups.com>
 <kbt19c$8hn$1@munin.nbi.dk>
 <9f066660-03c2-43f5-bc49-56c12cc64147@googlegroups.com>
 <1f0ker88itmx9$.1x7hzz1o8x7ax$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <d18f051c-24a4-45f6-bcde-40be50edbf6f@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: cDN0fd8KlIeJLyErIrSf0A.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: 2013-01-02T11:00:27+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 08:55:33 -0800 (PST), Justin Time wrote:

> Le mardi 1 janvier 2013 13:24:41 UTC+1, Dmitry A. Kazakov a �crit�:
>> On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 02:46:44 -0800 (PST), Justin Time wrote:
>> 
>>> The life-cycle of widgets in GTK is rather cryptic.
>> 
>> Hmm, I think any GTK tutorial mentions reference counting. There is nothing
>> to do/worry about widget's life-cycle. Except for dialogs all widgets are
>> destroyed implicitly.
>> 
> My comment was about initialization of widgets (realize/show) and its children,

I see. I don't think that even GTK maintainers have a clear picture of the
sequence of signals, especially, for complex widgets, popups etc.

However it is clear that a tool would make the problem only worse.

-- 
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de