From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 'Size hack for enumerated types Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 19:00 +0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: BISA/P8IHJbAM3ms471zeQ.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20775 Date: 2014-07-07T19:00:00+03:00 List-Id: Jeffrey Carter wrote: > On 07/06/2014 04:01 PM, Victor Porton wrote: >> >> I see no reason for Increment function to work well with Convention => C, >> it seems that you are lucky with your compiler. > > Clearly you don't understand Convention C. > >> After all Flag_Type and enum flag_type may be of different size! > > No, they may not. Convention C means the Ada compiler should represent the > type exactly as the (targeted) C compiler would represent the equivalent C > type. Where in the Reference Manual it is said that Ada enumeration types are "equivalent" to C int (=enum) type? -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org