From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!feed.news.schlund.de!schlund.de!news.online.de!not-for-mail
From: Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@altum.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Benchmark Ada, please
Date: Sun, 06 Jul 2014 19:24:17 +0200
Organization: Privat
Message-ID: <lpc0o2$pdc$1@online.de>
References: <lp6nva$q8g$1@speranza.aioe.org> <lp8rct$f4a$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: p3ee33dfc.dip0.t-ipconnect.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: online.de 1404667458 26028 62.227.61.252 (6 Jul 2014 17:24:18 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@einsundeins.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 6 Jul 2014 17:24:18 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20746
Date: 2014-07-06T19:24:17+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Guillaume Foliard wrote:

> Here are the numbers with GNAT GPL 2014 on a Core2 Q9650 @ 3.00GHz:

Tried it on my (Linux) system, Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3520M CPU @ 2.90GHz, FSF 
Gnat 4.6 as provided by Debian Jessie:

> $ gnatmake -O3 rbc_ada.adb
> $ time ./rbc_ada
> ...
> Elapsed time is = 1.966112682

% gnatmake -O3 Rbc_Ada.adb
% time ./Rbc_Ada
...

Elapsed time is = 1.909959513
./Rbc_Ada  1,91s user 0,00s system 97% cpu 1,972 total

> As for the C++ version:

I used g++ 4.9 on the same system:
 
> $ g++ -o testc -O3 RBC_CPP.cpp
> $ time ./testc
> ...
> Elapsed time is   = 3.12033

% g++ -o testc -O3 RBC_CPP.cpp
% time ./testc                                                                                                                           
...
 
Elapsed time is   = 2.13568
 
./testc  2,14s user 0,00s system 99% cpu 2,143 total

> So the Ada version is significantly faster

As you can see, Ada is still faster, but I wouldn't call that significantly 
;).

Bye...

	Dirk
-- 
Dirk Heinrichs <dirk.heinrichs@altum.de>
Tel: +49 (0)2471 209385 | Mobil: +49 (0)176 34473913
GPG Public Key CB614542 | Jabber: dirk.heinrichs@altum.de
Sichere Internetkommunikation: http://www.retroshare.org