From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: a new language, designed for safety !
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 12:18:46 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <logs26$5sl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <lmj8s6$hhp$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <1402308235.2520.153.camel@pascal.home.net> <85ioo9yukk.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <ln6tlg$1vc$1@dont-email.me>
 <255b51cd-b23f-4413-805a-9fea3c70d8b2@googlegroups.com>
 <ln6uv9$bk8$1@dont-email.me>
 <b22db9fb-a73d-438a-8cfd-f0bb1db70eed@googlegroups.com>
 <MPElv.491358$1w1.428312@fx03.iad> <ln77ei$de6$1@dont-email.me>
 <ln7pqb$s35$2@dont-email.me>
 <1129440363424130728.266844laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <op.xh07x3krule2fv@cardamome>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 10:18:46 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="9e449da8dff131e3c6c81b3db3365d93";
	logging-data="6037"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/UCO2ZPaw9k8reZfVWvRXo"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
In-Reply-To: <op.xh07x3krule2fv@cardamome>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:64apD8b6EGGFBsnWVtT8g4ysskw=
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:20613
Date: 2014-06-26T12:18:46+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Le 26/06/2014 00:40, Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) a écrit :
>> I have similar concerns now they are the ones 'controlling' the future is
>> ASIS, as there's no external agency defining the packages, […]
> 
> Isn't it an ISO standard? Or it isn't anymore?
There is a standard for Ada 95. There was a decision not to make a
standard for Ada 2005, now that Ada2012 is out.

The ARG decided to standardize existing practice rather than try
inventing. There should be a standard, but only after it is stabilized
on the side of the providers (TBH: AdaCore). But AdaCore developments
are made available to some members of the ARG (!) to check that they are
acceptable.

-- 
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00
http://www.adalog.fr