From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9eb88bb80477ed08 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.glorb.com!hwmnpeer01.lga!hwmedia!news-server.columbus.rr.com!cyclone2.kc.rr.com!news2.kc.rr.com!tornado.socal.rr.com.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ADA compilers/ difference between 83 and 95 References: From: Keith Thompson Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:of8pftLHlyZYskplpBZQfgUilDI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2005 00:10:21 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.75.136.120 X-Complaints-To: abuse@rr.com X-Trace: tornado.socal.rr.com 1117843821 66.75.136.120 (Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:10:21 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 17:10:21 PDT Organization: Road Runner High Speed Online http://www.rr.com Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11230 Date: 2005-06-04T00:10:21+00:00 List-Id: Chris Albertson writes: > Sorry aout the last message hadno text. Here is is again > > I'm curious, will ada83 programs not compile under ada95? > > If there is a problem where is it? What part of the language spec > changed in an incompatable way? [snip] The biggest change is the new reserved words that Ada 83 programs might use as identifiers. (That's actually not a very common problem, as far as I know). The best way to find out is to try compiling the code with an Ada 95 compiler and read the error messages. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this.