From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.stack.nl!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Victor Porton Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Implicit dereferences rational question Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 22:22:53 +0300 Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: LRua1LhEwYx/r1KnMXeYtA.user.speranza.aioe.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org User-Agent: KNode/4.12.4 X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Original-Bytes: 1084 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:186468 Date: 2014-05-18T22:22:53+03:00 List-Id: Robert A Duff wrote: > Victor Porton writes: > >> Why implicit dereferences use only access discriminants, not arbitrary >> access fields? > > It helps prevent dangling pointers. In which way limiting to discriminants may prevent dangling pointers? -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org