From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Safety of unprotected concurrent operations on constant objects
Date: Sun, 04 May 2014 13:29:58 -0700
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net;
 news.eternal-september.org
Message-ID: <lk6806$17k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <slrnlm6mkg.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
	<7403d130-8b42-43cd-a0f1-53ba34b46141@googlegroups.com>
	<slrnlmals8.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
	<lya9aybkxc.fsf@pushface.org>
 <lk41jr$1vl$1@dont-email.me>
	<slrnlmbs1n.i0l.lithiumcat@nat.rebma.instinctive.eu>
	<lk62fl$pr8$1@dont-email.me>
 <ly7g618hfq.fsf@pushface.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 20:30:00 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="42ea65963a295dd28559459f9f96c6a5";
 logging-data="1268"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19l9RKAbPyjkRY3Eg3VioGFnRcIyAZexJQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
In-Reply-To: <ly7g618hfq.fsf@pushface.org>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Yf6P7TU1IqnheDyjgM5Avs6W6PA=
X-Original-Bytes: 2130
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:186220
Date: 2014-05-04T13:29:58-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 05/04/2014 12:36 PM, Simon Wright wrote:
> Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> writes:
>
>> And since you have the source to GNAT's ordered map package, you can
>> look at it and see that this specific implementation is not task safe.
>
> I had a look at it following this thread, and I have to say it's quite
> challenging. Could do with some architectural documentation, I think!

I'm taking as correct the assertion here that the implementation is not task 
safe. I haven't looked at it myself.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Brave Sir Robin ran away."
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
59