From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 10:59:46 -0500
From: Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Simp,e example for 2 tasks
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2014 11:59:46 -0400
Organization: IISS Elusive Unicorn
Message-ID: <ljst1ahlc3oda0ahrjjsdq46bh5jnq7j9c@4ax.com>
References: <9b22dd09-6137-4f4b-8be1-28255032df70@googlegroups.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186
X-No-Archive: YES
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.79.221.234
X-Trace: 
 sv3-apLY5i8/j9JlBua/CI6xVIV4KMKsQcWzwsS7t57PV5OR/MLyYKcPefDCaaViB9081VDb7PRwNSgw+cz!LDKpk3jjNkRXYKtTFC5BvoBfSoZCq7KsMf1GYcteTuqm6vUSPp2QnX2QV5ArZjxloW2KIQ/OY/En!/al/dCdQfqKJdA+YWybxYEsUHZid
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Bytes: 2843
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:189070
Date: 2014-09-21T11:59:46-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 06:31:28 -0700 (PDT), Stribor40 <ikamzic@gmail.com>
declaimed the following:

>Would anyone be able to post simple example of ada program showing 2 tasks taking to each other please.  For example one task sends message to another saying "hi" and second taks replying "hi back". 
>I am having troubles finding example of simple program like this online

	Well... The problem domain is slightly under-specified.

	Ada doesn't "send message" in the way you may be thinking. It's more a
"pass a note during a handshake" (Rendezvous).

	The problem with your description is that of sequencing. A straight
linear interpretation is:

Task A										Task B
begin										begin
rendezvous with Task B					wait for rendezvous from any task
												end rendezvous
wait for rendezvous from any task			rendezvous with Task A
	end rendezvous
end											end

	There is nothing being passed there -- the rendezvous itself is the
"message". There is also no work being done inside the rendezvous. AND the
sequence is pretty much lock-step: B does nothing until A connects, then A
does nothing until B decides to connect to it.

	An alternative would be using an IN and OUT parameter on the rendezvous

begin										begin
rendezvous with B("Hello", reply)			wait for rendezvous(IN msg,
																OUT reply)
												reply = "Hello Back"
												end rendezvous
end											end

	Here there is only one rendezvous... one "handshake"; A does nothing
during the rendezvous until B ends the rendezvous after doing whatever it
wants (setting reply).

											
-- 
	Wulfraed                 Dennis Lee Bieber         AF6VN
    wlfraed@ix.netcom.com    HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/