From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Simon Clubley <clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Oberon and Wirthian languages
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:21:55 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <lj4cn3$gkp$1@dont-email.me>
References: <1ljwj8f.1wqbhvuabsdw1N%csampson@inetworld.net>
 <51c7d6d4-e3be-44d5-a4ce-f7e875345588@googlegroups.com>
 <li9g34$9q8$1@dont-email.me> <%J32v.70539$kp1.45343@fx14.iad>
 <lic17o$re4$1@dont-email.me> <8761m535e4.fsf_-_@ludovic-brenta.org>
 <lj3540$m81$1@dont-email.me> <lj3n47$u2e$1@dont-email.me>
 <mHd5v.110220$nm4.61317@fx27.iad> <lj49fn$bg0$1@loke.gir.dk>
Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 00:21:55 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="e458ff8b81bc0c159989eb0e36c6e372";
 logging-data="17049"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/XeSaitP9HvEgygA6Vc26yX5eregyOq3w="
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (VMS/Multinet)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:gK8uxPd6cYaUS3wVpLvCEkId+qk=
X-Original-Bytes: 2807
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:185923
Date: 2014-04-22T00:21:55+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2014-04-21, Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> wrote:
> "Shark8" <OneWingedShark@gmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:mHd5v.110220$nm4.61317@fx27.iad...
> ...
>> So it's not unaddressed in Ada, but it is a little awkward; I think some
>> of these could be helped by Ada 2012 aspects though [Size & Bit_Order on
>> the component types]. (There's also the question of what happens when a
>> component type of the opposite Bit_Order is included... that may be
>> answered in the LRM, but I simply don't recall reading it.)
>
> The RM definitely describes what happens in the alternative bit-order. 
> Unfortunately, the description will probably give you a headache. All of the 
> stuff about "machine scalars" relates to this subject. It's not an easy 
> subject at all.
>

Shark8's message has not shown up at Eternal September, so I am replying
to Randy's extract above.

I did know about the bit ordering options in Ada, but thanks. The
"absolutely crazy" comment was directed towards what we have to do
in C and the fact I would like to see something much better in any
C language replacement.

BTW, stuff like this is exactly the kind of thing we could introduce into
a new language without reducing the "hackability" that many C programmers
seem to look for in their language choice (as people here have reminded
me several times over the last few days :-)).

Simon.

-- 
Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP
Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world