From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Type Transcriptions Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 12:42:43 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net; news.eternal-september.org Message-ID: References: <53554D3F.8050009@shaw.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2014 19:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="7860b8cfd05853faa826624a41f2b899"; logging-data="4031"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/o5zl88swZ9qGy0/BKjh5sLJ9Onx7x5DU=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:nctz3j1tO/pJzHRa/f1GkthIBjE= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:19474 Date: 2014-04-21T12:42:43-07:00 List-Id: On 04/21/2014 11:51 AM, Shark8 wrote: > > I suppose the better way to phrase it is: > "Is it better to strictly stick to the spec, letting generic instantiation take > care of these 'extra-typal' parameters, *OR* doing things the natural Ada way, > and worrying about 'fixing-up' things in, say, 'Input and 'Output operations." My vote is for the Ada way, as long as the functionality is correct. Making it clear, easy to read and understand, and correct are the important things. -- Jeff Carter "I like it when the support group complains that they have insufficient data on mean time to repair bugs in Ada software." Robert I. Eachus 91