From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!zen.net.uk!dedekind.zen.co.uk!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: tmoran@acm.org Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Heartbleed Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 04:27:37 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: ctzNvbglj4/lWra7P0RFSQ.user.speranza.aioe.org X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2 X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader X-Original-Bytes: 1038 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:185834 Date: 2014-04-19T04:27:37+00:00 List-Id: > I just had an idea: Make a version of Ada with a compiler switch > to remove all type checking! This might be the key to making > Ada popular? :) Remove all checking at both compile and run time (if indeed there's any distinction). What programmer wants a compiler that disses him? If the code seems weird, it must be that the programmer is being fiendishly clever. And you can't sell a program that won't compile!