From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,900edaa189af2033
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Andre Spiegel <spiegel@berlin.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>
Subject: Re: Ada95 OOP Questions
Date: 1996/07/30
Message-ID: <lhmohkyeytg.fsf@berlin.berlin.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 171180984
sender: spiegel@berlin.berlin.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de
references: <4tf3l4$4hu@masala.cc.uh.edu>
organization: University of Stuttgart, Germany
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1996-07-30T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Spasmo writes:

> Here are things as I understand them (correct me if I'm wrong).

I'll do my very best ;).  In order to avoid confusion, you shouldn't
use the word "class" when referring to Ada programs this way.  "Class"
in Ada means something different (a hierarchy of types).  Each time
you wrote "class" in your message, you should replace it with "type",
and then it sounds pretty much correct.