From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5273560b0d59d454 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-22 12:06:04 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!nntpserver.pppl.gov!princeton!udel!rochester!cornell!travelers.mail.cornell.edu!news.kei.com!news.mathworks.com!hookup!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!ftpbox!mothost!delphinium.cig.mot.com!ferret!leschkes From: leschkes@ferret.cig.mot.com (Scott Leschke) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: OS/2 GNAT and threads Date: 22 Feb 95 20:06:04 GMT Organization: Motorola Cellular Infrastructure Group Message-ID: References: <3hg3mq$f7j@jerry.rb.icl.co.uk> <3hr4i9$rs2@cyclope.enst.fr> <3htq1m$a98@corona.VisiCom.COM> <3i3eba$hve@gnat.cs.nyu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: ferret.rtsg.mot.com Date: 1995-02-22T20:06:04+00:00 List-Id: dewar@cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: >It is NOT a good idea going and doing your own thread creation in a GNAT >context. Lots of things will break! And why on earth would you want to anyway ? That low-level thread stuff is best left to compiler implementors and C programmer types who don't have a better alternative. Scott Leschke Motorola Inc. I normally don't use a disclaimer but I'll say that this time this is strictly MHO and not necessarily my employers. Actually I doubt Motorola as a corporation has an opinion on this matter but it needed to be said just the same. -- Scott Leschke