From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,e9c4fd87d5e1f936,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-01-18 14:19:48 PST
Path: 
 nntp.gmd.de!Germany.EU.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.sprintlink.net!pipex!uunet!ftpbox!mothost!delphinium.cig.mot.com!ferret!leschkes
From: leschkes@ferret.cig.mot.com (Scott Leschke)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Adjust, Finalize
Date: 18 Jan 95 22:19:48 GMT
Organization: Motorola Cellular Infrastructure Group
Message-ID: <leschkes.790467588@ferret>
NNTP-Posting-Host: ferret.rtsg.mot.com
Date: 1995-01-18T22:19:48+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Just as a check, are the procedures Adjust and Finalize implicitly protected
against simultanious invocation by multiple tasks ?  I expect not but I can
see that there could be some situations where having these two operations be
atomic would be beneficial.  I expect that those cases are handled
independently but since I didn't see anything in the LRM specifically
addressing this I thought I'd ask just to be sure.

As always, thanks in advance,

Scott Leschke
Motorola Inc.
-- 
Scott Leschke