From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_DATE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f891f,78850d82ea9c576 X-Google-Attributes: gidf891f,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,78850d82ea9c576 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-23 08:20:34 PST Path: nntp.gmd.de!newsserver.jvnc.net!news.edu.tw!rs540.ncu.edu.tw!news.cc.nctu.edu.tw!nctuccca.edu.tw!howland.reston.ans.net!math.ohio-state.edu!news.acns.nwu.edu!ftpbox!mothost!delphinium.cig.mot.com!ferret!leschkes From: leschkes@ferret.cig.mot.com (Scott Leschke) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Multithreading Date: 23 Nov 94 16:20:34 GMT Organization: Motorola Cellular Infrastructure Group Message-ID: References: <3ai8f0$ru5@theopolis.orl.mmc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ferret.rtsg.mot.com Xref: nntp.gmd.de comp.lang.ada:16983 comp.lang.misc:9801 Date: 1994-11-23T16:20:34+00:00 List-Id: >>The free GNAT Ada 9X compiler is built on top of a POSIX threads >>library. Thus, it always uses O/S threads for Ada tasks. I haven't had the opportunity to use GNAT yet although I've been the discussions on c.l.a. Regarding the above statement and a previous statement made by Bob Dewar regarding the POSSIBLE performance penalty associated with mapping Ada tasks to OS threads, does GNAT allow you to specify whether to use OS tasking or not ? Is this even be possible ? Scott Leschke