From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.66.102.36 with SMTP id fl4mr2937763pab.20.1390058402262; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 07:20:02 -0800 (PST) Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!kk17no11310971pbb.0!news-out.google.com!fv6ni4926qab.1!nntp.google.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.glorb.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simon Clubley Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Delays for implementations of Fortran features Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Injection-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="08a9720bd536685a129f58caf5d18473"; logging-data="29222"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18e6P+uqXsLMhBGvoq6dG3V//ZUn4MjYck=" User-Agent: slrn/0.9.9p1 (Linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:MViPA8LrlP6uwWWWVe6yH56aBNM= X-Received-Bytes: 2601 X-Received-Body-CRC: 2532233569 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Bytes: 2937 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:184463 Date: 2014-01-18T15:20:01+00:00 List-Id: On 2014-01-18, Colin Paul Gloster wrote: > On 18th January 2014, Simon Clubley sent: >|-----------------------------------------------------------------------| >|"[. . .] | >| | >|Now onto my response to your message, which can be accurately summed up| >|as "so ?". | >| | >|[. . .] | >| | >|Simon." | >|-----------------------------------------------------------------------| > > Perhaps you do not find it remarkable that during 2014 people compile > Fortran codes (which are not in FORTRAN 77) with compilers which fully > support neither F2003 nor F2008. So to translate that into Ada, are you saying that people should only be using the very latest Ada revisions and hence only the latest compilers ? If so, that's so out of touch with reality I don't know where to begin. Simon. -- Simon Clubley, clubley@remove_me.eisner.decus.org-Earth.UFP [Note: email address not currently working as the system is physically moving] Microsoft: Bringing you 1980s technology to a 21st century world