From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 10261c,90121986704b5776 X-Google-Attributes: gid10261c,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 10c950,90121986704b5776 X-Google-Attributes: gid10c950,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 1014db,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid1014db,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,4873305131bf4d94 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "Dennis Weldy" Subject: Re: Your english sucks, mine is better. Date: 1997/11/24 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 292186569 References: <65ab3u$v07$1@news.nyu.edu> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Organization: Intergraph Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.lang.pascal.ansi-iso,comp.lang.pascal.misc Date: 1997-11-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: That's incorrect. One can still be a capitalist, and still have ethics, honesty, and integrity. They aren't mutually exclusive. Dennis billg@jk.pst.com wrote in message ... >In article <65ab3u$v07$1@news.nyu.edu>, kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu says... >> In article billg@jk.pst.com writes: >> >In article , dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu says... >> >> Andy Koenig says >> >> >> >> <> >> employer to look in, say, DejaNews to see what I had posted on Usenet >> >> in the past.>> >> >> >> >> Absolutely, I think this is standard practice at this stage. >> >> You can often find out quite a lot about peoploe by seeing what they have >> >> said in public! >> >> >> >Not everyone feels that this medium requires honesty, integrity, ethics etc. >> >> Precisely. That's exactly why such a search is useful. I, for one, >> would never hire somebody who thought that there was *any* medium or >> forum that did not require honesty, integrity, and ethics. >> >Well then you don't fall into the category of capitalist either because >being dishonest and unethical is at the core of capitalistic "success". >But then you were referring to _other_ people weren't you. Your >marketing people (and managers) will inherently be dishonest and >unethical by definition of the way things really work. You're still a >pup. Or many preach, few practice what they preach.