From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,83d2d63f98e99c58
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-14 10:24:18 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!wn11feed!wn12feed!worldnet.att.net!204.127.198.203!attbi_feed3!attbi.com!sccrnsc01.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tmoran@acm.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C to Ada conversion
References: <toYU9.678062$WL3.715692@rwcrnsc54>
X-Newsreader: Tom's custom newsreader
Message-ID: <lBYU9.72633$3v.13223@sccrnsc01>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.234.13.56
X-Complaints-To: abuse@attbi.com
X-Trace: sccrnsc01 1042568657 12.234.13.56 (Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:24:17 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:24:17 GMT
Organization: AT&T Broadband
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 18:24:17 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33009
Date: 2003-01-14T18:24:17+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> >ok but otherwise it is very dangerous because it does not take into
> >account that in Ada the index range of arrays does not necessarly
  On second thought, a more accurate translation from the C, and
one that would be less general and thus perhaps show better in a
benchmark, would be to replace
  type Matrices is array (Integer range <>, Integer range <>) of Float;
by
  Rs : constant := 6;
  type Matrices is array (1 .. Rs, 1 .. Rs) of Float;