From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!2.us.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!216.166.98.84.MISMATCH!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!buffer1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 06:51:36 -0600 From: Dennis Lee Bieber Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 'Leap Second' to Be Added on New Year's Eve This Year Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 07:51:38 -0500 Organization: IISS Elusive Unicorn Message-ID: References: <5f5afd36-1ba2-f4e2-62ef-57a652f3170c@verizon.net> <5873c46b.1761953@news.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 X-No-Archive: YES MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 108.73.117.105 X-Trace: sv3-2qD7g6T4ydFAKZlZgoEnuWT7z0Tp1M+vODsWIoyZaQN8weAjZEFa4hNuI/T5Ma3EWs+F9lXaHoTmAeD!5kPRdl9Lix7zgbFIZPjLKYSQ10PVu6DvOkyqyeCUaobF4h8X+x27gtbzsu8ocPBNav7lJBDXzpJr!vH7S5+ehU72ICjyNo5ZxEIB2X8Dr X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2299 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:33094 Date: 2017-01-13T07:51:38-05:00 List-Id: On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:24:21 +0100, Björn Lundin declaimed the following: >The bells should ring in the new year, but failed. >This is the first time a computer controlled the ringing. > >Now- I think the program was polling the time, >and when it polled 00:00:01 - and checked the date, >it actually found 23:59:60 and concluded that this is the >wrong day => do not start ringing. > >The day after - at 00:00:01 it did the same thing, and >the bells started to ring in the new year - 24 hours too late... > > >Yes - I speculate - but I don't think leap seconds only affect >super-duper-time-sensitive calcuations. Could be something as simple as cycling from 23:59:59 to 24:00:00 (still not the "new day") followed by 00:00:01 (new day, but not midnight) -- Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/