From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d5fc258548b22a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder2.cambriumusenet.nl!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <31c357bd-c8dc-4583-a454-86d9c579e5f4@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <05a3673e-fb97-449c-94ed-1139eb085c32@x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <4d4c232a$0$28967$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4D4D6506.50909@obry.net> <4d50095f$0$22393$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <4d6d56c4$0$11509$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <16u9ka51wbukr$.1fj2sb73j9rv6.dlg@40tude.net> <4d6d627b$0$11509$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <29c4lixc0ght$.14kkfz1kij135.dlg@40tude.net> <4d6d6afb$0$11509$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> <1gz9984wwizn5.r619fw4z9o56.dlg@40tude.net> <4d6e5614$0$21954$882e7ee2@usenet-news.net> Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 16:30:31 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 02 Mar 2011 16:30:31 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 1d30e340.newsspool2.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=^Jl9fP8:mmfPXlQ;h]GTMdA9EHlD;3Ycb4Fo<]lROoRa8kF On Wed, 02 Mar 2011 09:36:50 -0500, Hyman Rosen wrote: > That they then have to implement this interface via the C Postgres > SQL client should be irrelevant This is where the bug was, in interfacing the PostgreSQL client. It has nothing to do with Ada. >> All problems are on the client size, which is untyped because C cannot >> capture the set of DB types, and RDBMS is unable to describe the semantics >> and internal representation of these types. Ada cannot save you of you are >> sitting on top of a cesspit. You are already there, enjoy it! > > You may wave your hands and rant all you like, but in fact the error > was a simple one - the programmer of the SQL interface made a mistake > and added quotes to strings which were being bound to parameters, where > this should not be done. And if the interface were typed that could never happen. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de