From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,PLING_QUERY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!reality.xs3.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Q: Binding tasks to CPU's seems not to work with Task_Info pragma?! Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:34:58 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <52067edc$0$82030$afc38c87@news5.united-newsserver.de><9330a5a6-8740-436e-bb75-e990ce565038@googlegroups.com> <520699bb$0$2256$afc38c87@news6.united-newsserver.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1376339699 21970 69.95.181.76 (12 Aug 2013 20:34:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:34:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Original-Bytes: 2068 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182997 Date: 2013-08-12T15:34:58-05:00 List-Id: Why are you using that rather than the Ada 2012 pragma (or better yet, aspect) CPU? task type Task_Type (Id : Ada.Multiprocessors.CPU) is pragma Priority(4); pragma CPU(Id); end Task_Type; or better still: task type Task_Type (Id : Ada.Multiprocessors.CPU) with Priority => 4, CPU => Id is end Task_Type; Randy. "Michael Erdmann" wrote in message news:520699bb$0$2256$afc38c87@news6.united-newsserver.de... > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:17:03 -0700, AdaMagica wrote: > >> Pragma Task_Info is not standard Ada. Must be GNAT specific. > > Yes; it is GNAT specific: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_rm/Pragma-Task_005fInfo.html > > > /Michael >