From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,60e2922351e0e780
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-11-16 17:34:19 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!small1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!intern1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp.comcast.com!news.comcast.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 19:34:17 -0600
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 20:34:16 -0500
From: "Robert I. Eachus" <rieachus@comcast.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US;
 rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Clause "with and use"
References: <bebbba07.0311081140.e0e94e6@posting.google.com>
 <bebbba07.0311111235.e74c902@posting.google.com>
 <bormns$1i4d87$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <3FB1609E.D56E315C@fakeaddress.nil>
 <borog2$1fpdhl$1@ID-175126.news.uni-berlin.de>
 <bebbba07.0311122326.690bd121@posting.google.com>
 <bp0nqn$afi$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <bebbba07.0311132145.58a4541e@posting.google.com>
 <bp22op$1ltd$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <bebbba07.0311141523.3c523f8c@posting.google.com>
 <G-udnYiJ3bOJ2SuiRVn-tg@comcast.com>
 <bebbba07.0311152155.4f9eef5b@posting.google.com>
 <QoGdnZ7N--gQTSqi4p2dnA@comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <QoGdnZ7N--gQTSqi4p2dnA@comcast.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <ktCdnSMO4uEHuCWiRVn-hQ@comcast.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.34.214.193
X-Trace: 
 sv3-EQ8TWV1y2oHRMyVq8ZRBOtEpONFEoYj55gbtaYpZLMN87qWUumzCHrles4GoeGzbwcBQtccqq3e44Mv!w5X8uGPqCXOgweTXUoS7MGubyiyiWEN1HU/qI8bsD1HVBOl/FAfO/ePHQeCIbA==
X-Complaints-To: abuse@comcast.net
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: dmca@comcast.net
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.1
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2551
Date: 2003-11-16T20:34:16-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Oops!

Robert I. Eachus wrote:

> Note that 10.1.6(2) gives the visibility rules within use clauses, and 
...within WITH clauses,...

> 10.1.6(3) the visibility rules within pragmas and use clauses in context 
> clauses.  They are different.  They have to be different.  There are 
> lots of with and use clauses where a "with and use" construct could be 
> made to work--and most programmers would be happy with such a construct 
> having 10.1.6(2) type visibility.  But there are lots of existing 
> pragmas and use clauses in existing code that depend on 10.1.6(3) type 
> visibility and I see no justification for breaking all that code.

Well at least I didn't try to say, "...used within with clauses..." 
even if I got that right, who would understand it?

-- 
                                           Robert I. Eachus

100% Ada, no bugs--the only way to create software.