From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problem with limited with
Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 10:13:37 -0700
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net
Message-ID: <kt0uo3$3kh$1@dont-email.me>
References: <lywqodrv51.fsf@pushface.org> <ksun08$tbn$1@dont-email.me>
 <cee34511-bfa7-49e1-a1b1-e7a01b42df58@googlegroups.com>
 <ksv36l$tnc$1@dont-email.me>
 <42dc042d-e458-42a4-abb7-23907982b88f@googlegroups.com>
 <ksvm86$5hu$1@dont-email.me>
 <c482c038-dd30-44c1-ac3b-f0334d9d28e5@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 17:07:16 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="68bb7ebc916066bb85146425b2aa8565";
	logging-data="3729"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+VzadiUV6in2O/d5eJX1Hn0omx0/34uxY="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To: <c482c038-dd30-44c1-ac3b-f0334d9d28e5@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bpB4nE4Yxdy5VO3BlVrAj0PQTb4=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16559
Date: 2013-07-27T10:13:37-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 07/27/2013 09:00 AM, Shark8 wrote:
>
> To be fair, the ONLY reason I have to use anonymous access types at all there
> is because GNAT chokes up when I try to use the type itself. (I think there's
> a comment to that effect elsewhere.)

About the only thing you can do with limited with is declare access types 
designating the types in the withed pkg, So of course an Ada compiler complains 
if you try to do anything else. When you avoid visible access types, you 
naturally avoid limited with. This is how I've been able to work on large 
projects (> 1000 pkgs) without a single limited with.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"This trial is a travesty. It's a travesty of a mockery of a
sham of a mockery of a travesty of two mockeries of a sham. ...
Do you realize there's not a single homosexual on that jury?"
Bananas
27