From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problem with limited with
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:42:27 -0700
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net
Message-ID: <ksvm86$5hu$1@dont-email.me>
References: <lywqodrv51.fsf@pushface.org> <ksun08$tbn$1@dont-email.me>
 <cee34511-bfa7-49e1-a1b1-e7a01b42df58@googlegroups.com>
 <ksv36l$tnc$1@dont-email.me>
 <42dc042d-e458-42a4-abb7-23907982b88f@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 05:36:08 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="68bb7ebc916066bb85146425b2aa8565";
 logging-data="5694"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+bMuMXN9zveZIL5LdbNc+75TTCHlsCPyc="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To: <42dc042d-e458-42a4-abb7-23907982b88f@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:0ALivBUuM0bX3/IpImGpEJ0Igu0=
X-Original-Bytes: 1618
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182706
Date: 2013-07-26T22:42:27-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 07/26/2013 07:32 PM, Shark8 wrote:
>
> Is that a bad design-choice? If so, why?

Certainly. It uses anonymous types and visible access types, both Bad Ideas.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"What I wouldn't give for a large sock with horse manure in it."
Annie Hall
42