From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newspeer1.nac.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problem with limited with
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 17:17:21 -0700
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net
Message-ID: <ksv36l$tnc$1@dont-email.me>
References: <lywqodrv51.fsf@pushface.org> <ksun08$tbn$1@dont-email.me>
 <cee34511-bfa7-49e1-a1b1-e7a01b42df58@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:11:03 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="68bb7ebc916066bb85146425b2aa8565";
 logging-data="30444"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
 posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/iAvmqwLiiT5AQAI5NmaVSLJqR6WpqEjg="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To: <cee34511-bfa7-49e1-a1b1-e7a01b42df58@googlegroups.com>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:icW32R2Z2C09vyCdpKR0eUvwRmY=
X-Original-Bytes: 2023
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182698
Date: 2013-07-26T17:17:21-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 07/26/2013 03:17 PM, Adam Beneschan wrote:
>
> C'mon, people.  It should be possible to ask a question about the language
> rules by posting a reduced case, without getting comments about why the
> poster didn't write his code a different way, or why the identifiers aren't
> descriptive, or why a complete working example wasn't posted or something.

It should be possible to post a reduced example that actually uses the feature
that causes the problem.

But even in that case, I'd still say the best solution is to avoid limited with.
Recursive types belong in the same pkg together. Limited with is a kludge to let 
people write JavAda and should never have been added in the 1st place.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"What I wouldn't give for a large sock with horse manure in it."
Annie Hall
42