From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Accessibility checks Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:41:48 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net Message-ID: References: <87mwplvthn.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 00:35:47 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="68bb7ebc916066bb85146425b2aa8565"; logging-data="19431"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+U4jCWZZw8K6k45nds8u/CFsVFrbblb10=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:eUGabjpmcKrHLv2bskBzXUJFbwU= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16404 Date: 2013-07-17T17:41:48-07:00 List-Id: On 07/17/2013 04:44 PM, Randy Brukardt wrote: > > That's not entirely true: I did find one (and only one) instance where I was > able to use 'Access in my code (it had to do with a library-level > initialization). I apologize if my memory was faulty. I too have found cases where 'Access worked, but like you I have found that they are rare. > It would be tempting to dump the entire accessibility mess into trash, but > the only alternative is erroneousness, which is too awful to contemplate. Isn't that what you get when you use 'Unchecked_Access? -- Jeff Carter "I unclog my nose towards you." Monty Python & the Holy Grail 11