From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.bbs-scene.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeffrey Carter Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Elaboration order handling (Was: Bug in 'gnatmake') Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 14:44:43 -0700 Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net Message-ID: References: <7f33982d-3bcf-452e-a3b3-3a0a28505ff1@x20g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> <87r4g0g9c0.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <87ip1bg4z2.fsf_-_@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <53d0b070-a03b-43d0-a560-68dd3a8bebf5@googlegroups.com> <51c218df$0$6623$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 21:39:37 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ea9e222491b6e4ac16c72e6c1b727e42"; logging-data="32682"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+V3oFMDwlIumudxawLTvwhbzDboWaI+Ww=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:kTz777y6+kOLM8pWvSSN/uuhZKY= X-Original-Bytes: 2993 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:182015 Date: 2013-06-21T14:44:43-07:00 List-Id: On 06/21/2013 01:43 PM, Adam Beneschan wrote: > > All you said was "I like the idea that something that's empty has to have > something special in it to show that it's deliberately empty." You didn't > say that that applied only to things ending in a semicolon. Don't blame me > for "comparing apples to oranges" when all you said was "fruit". True enough. It seemed obvious to me, but obviously wasn't. > Well, it could have, prior to Ada 2005. That's no longer possible, because > of null procedures. Ah, yes, another unnecessary shortcut. > Then why do you want a separate declarative part at all? Many popular > languages these days don't separate the two, and let you put declarations > anywhere you can put a code statement, or even in the middle of another > statement. So if you don't see a significant distinction, why not be > consistent? I addressed this in detail in a reply to Duff. Basically, I find it hard to find a specific declaration when reading such languages. -- Jeff Carter "Sheriff murdered, crops burned, stores looted, people stampeded, and cattle raped." Blazing Saddles 35