From: Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid>
Subject: Re: get_immediate echoe character--compiled error?
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 00:20:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ko6385F3ld0U1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v8bm41ow.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
On 2023-10-04 22:39, Keith Thompson wrote:
> Niklas Holsti <niklas.holsti@tidorum.invalid> writes:
>> On 2023-10-04 11:22, Simon Wright wrote:
>>> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> writes:
>>>>> The low-level Get_Immediate implementation is in sysdep.c (probably
>>>>> not in the adainclude/ directory in an installed compiler), in
>>>>> getc_immediate() and getc_immediate_nowait(), both of which call
>>>>> getc_immediate_common(), and I can't see any difference! ECHO gets
>>>>> turned off in getc_immediate_common(), regardless of caller - see
>>>>> link.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/3ca09d684e496240a87c0327687e2898060c2363/gcc/ada/sysdep.c#L387
>>>>
>>>> I haven't really looked into this, but I *think* what's happening is
>>>> that for the versions with the Available parameter, ECHO hasn't yet been
>>>> turned off when the user types the character. If you type 'x', it
>>>> echoes immediately, because the program has no way of knowing that the
>>>> character will later be consumed by a call to Get_Immediate. Presumably
>>>> if the user hasn't typed anything, causing Available to be set to false,
>>>> Get_Immediate will turn echoing off and back on again very quickly.
>>>> Echoing is disabled only for small fraction of a second it takes for
>>>> Get_Immediate to be executed.
>>>>
>>>> The Get_Immediate functions without the Available parameter block
>>>> until a character is entered. They can disable echoing before the
>>>> character is entered. Echoing will typically be disabled for minutes
>>>> or seconds, from the time Get_Immediate is called and the time the
>>>> user types something.
>>>>
>>>> The only solution I can think of would be to disable echoing (in some
>>>> non-portable manner; I don't think the standard library provides this)
>>>> before the user starts typing. (Perhaps you want to run the
>>>> Get_Immediate without the Available parameter in a separate task?)
>>> Great analysis!
>>
>>
>> Yes indeed.
>>
>> A possible solution in Text_IO would be for Get_Immediate with
>> Available not to enable echo when it exits. Get_Immediate with
>> Available is typically called repeatedly, with no other input from the
>> terminal in between these calls, so it should be ok to keep echo
>> disabled from one such call to another. Any non-immediate input
>> operation on the terminal (that is, on this Text_IO file) should start
>> by re-enabling echo if it was disabled. Possibly the same should apply
>> also to Get_Immediate without Available, that is, it should leave echo
>> disabled, until some non-immediate input operation re-enables echo.
>
> The *first* character typed would still echo.
Only if the user is quick enough to type it before the first call of
Get_Immediate.
If Get_Immediate is called for example to enter a password, usually the
program will first prompt the user to "Enter password:" and then at once
call Get_Immediate. Only a user who starts typing before the prompt is
visible would have time to type something before the (first) call of
Get_Immediate.
> I suggest that what's needed is a way to turn echoing on and off.
The user could still be quick enough to type characters before the echo
is turned off, so they would echo.
> Meanwhile, would calling Get_Immediate *without* the Available parameter
> (which blocks and turns echoing off until after a character is typed) in
> a separate task work? I haven't tried it.
That should work, provided that the Ada run-time system does not block
the whole program when one task blocks on an I/O request. There have
been, and perhaps still are, Ada programming systems where the whole Ada
program appears to the OS as a single OS thread so that one Ada task
waiting on a blocking OS call blocks all other tasks in the program.
> Of course you'd need to be careful not to have I/O calls from
> separate tasks interfere with each other.
Yes, but other tasks should be able to output text through
Standard_Output even while one task is reading Standard_Input using a
blocking I/O call. Except under a one-thread run-time system.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-04 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-02 2:42 get_immediate echoe character--compiled error? richardthiebaud
2023-10-02 5:48 ` Keith Thompson
2023-10-02 20:07 ` richardthiebaud
2023-10-02 22:27 ` Keith Thompson
2023-10-02 22:41 ` richardthiebaud
2023-10-02 22:47 ` richardthiebaud
2023-10-03 8:41 ` Niklas Holsti
2023-10-03 10:20 ` Simon Wright
2023-10-04 0:13 ` Keith Thompson
2023-10-04 8:22 ` Simon Wright
2023-10-04 10:48 ` Jeffrey R.Carter
2023-10-04 11:38 ` Simon Wright
2023-10-04 13:05 ` Jeffrey R.Carter
2023-10-05 0:43 ` Randy Brukardt
2023-10-04 16:55 ` Niklas Holsti
2023-10-04 19:39 ` Keith Thompson
2023-10-04 21:20 ` Niklas Holsti [this message]
2023-10-03 21:00 ` G.B.
2023-10-04 21:14 ` Jeffrey R.Carter
2023-10-04 22:12 ` Keith Thompson
2023-10-05 9:51 ` Jeffrey R.Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox