From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,97ae587931c0f702
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: kmradke@inav.net (Kevin Radke)
Subject: Re: Ada Task priorities
Date: 1997/01/28
Message-ID: <kmradke-2801971854120001@dip58.inav.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 212974084
references: <kmradke-2601971335300001@dip7.inav.net>
 <5cj01d$oft@top.mitre.org>
organization: KrustyLand Amusement Park
newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-01-28T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <5cj01d$oft@top.mitre.org>, mfb@mbunix.mitre.org (Michael F
Brenner) wrote:

> Of course, then there is no reason to make a, b, and c tasks at all.
> Instead the above code could be the main loop of a single task.

In reality I simplified the question considerably.  The actual application
has 25+ tasks.  (This makes things a lot more interesting... :)

Kevin

-- 
/\/\Under Construction/\/\ kmradke@inav.net