From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d6bef031ed123ab2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kmradke@inav.net (Kevin Radke) Subject: Re: objectada for GREAT programs ? Date: 1996/10/26 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 192258875 references: <326E457E.41C67EA6@aut.alcatel.at> organization: KrustyLand Amusement Park newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-26T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article , bobduff@world.std.com (Robert A Duff) wrote: > In article , > Kevin Radke wrote: > >I (re)compile 200k+ lines of code on a regular basis. Code alone is > >at least 20Mb, with the largest executable almost 10meg in size. > > Are you saying your source code is 200K lines, and 20Mb? That's an > average of 100 characters per line. Most Ada code I've seen is around > 30 characters per line, on average. Am I misunderstanding your figures? > Or is there a typo somewhere there? I suppose confusion of terminology. My lines of code does NOT count comments, and this code is HEAVILY commented. The actual lines of code counting comments is at least double the original amount. (The 20Mb is a rough guess too. That includes some extra junk that isn't truely ada source.) Kevin -- /\/\Under Construction/\/\ kmradke@inav.net