From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d6bef031ed123ab2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: kmradke@inav.net (Kevin Radke) Subject: Re: objectada for GREAT programs ? Date: 1996/10/24 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 192143468 references: <326E457E.41C67EA6@aut.alcatel.at> organization: KrustyLand Amusement Park newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1996-10-24T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <326E457E.41C67EA6@aut.alcatel.at>, Walter Leidenfrost wrote: > Are there any experiences with Objectada for winNT, > as far as handling of real HUGE sources (all in all approx. 7MB) are > concerned ? Compilation times, etc ? I (re)compile 200k+ lines of code on a regular basis. Code alone is at least 20Mb, with the largest executable almost 10meg in size. Total build directory size is well over 200Mb. The whole thing usually takes around 2.5 hours to build from scratch on a P120 with 32Mb of memory. Would do better with more memory and a fast SCSI drive instead of IDE... Kevin -- /\/\Under Construction/\/\ kmradke@inav.net