From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-FeedAbuse: http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 78.192.65.63
Path: 
 border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!usenet-fr.net!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!nntpfeed.proxad.net!news.muarf.org!news.ecp.fr!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Generic access type convention and aliasing
Date: Mon, 6 May 2013 19:56:34 -0500
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <km9jg4$eue$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <op.wwmy7p00ule2fv@cardamome> <op.wwneq7xtule2fv@cardamome>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1367888196 15310 69.95.181.76 (7 May 2013 00:56:36 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 00:56:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Response
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
X-Original-Bytes: 1993
Date: 2013-05-06T19:56:34-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr> wrote in message 
news:op.wwneq7xtule2fv@cardamome...
>I also wished I could specify it must be a limited access type. Out of 
>curiosity, I searched the web on this topic, and found this was already 
>proposed. See this AI:
>
>http://www.ada-auth.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/ai05s/ai05-0142-2.txt?rev=1.3
>
>The status is "Work item".

No, it's "No Action". This was a discarded alternative to what eventually 
was implemented with explicitly aliased parameters and generalized 
references. We eventually realized that access discriminants already had the 
correct semantics so we didn't need a new feature for that.

So I wouldn't wait for any implementation of this proposal. :-)

                                     Randy.