From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3e9e2e402ed75bc3 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.66.8.69 with SMTP id p5mr4891151paa.46.1367620886495; Fri, 03 May 2013 15:41:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: ln4ni1293pbb.0!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!cyclone02.ams2.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!voer-me.highwinds-media.com!newsfeed.eweka.nl!eweka.nl!feeder3.eweka.nl!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!news.ecp.fr!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: aws vs ruby rails or php? how much faster? Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 17:41:08 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <87vc7fm3lp.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <517627a4$0$32104$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1bjhu6xj0sh4e.1u1r23nzr3zrh$.dlg@40tude.net> <14ba012e-aa71-4fa4-a582-f51a4f1e1f09@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1367620869 19764 69.95.181.76 (3 May 2013 22:41:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 22:41:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Received-Bytes: 2519 Date: 2013-05-03T17:41:08-05:00 List-Id: "Shark8" wrote in message news:14ba012e-aa71-4fa4-a582-f51a4f1e1f09@googlegroups.com... > On Thursday, May 2, 2013 3:13:24 PM UTC-6, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> >> The web server still >> runs on the 900 MHZ W2K server (soon to be retired in favor of a new >> Debian >> machine - with 3GHZ with 8 virtual cores - a rather different >> environment). > > Out of curiosity, how much of that was directly-portable? Can't tell you yet, I haven't tried to actually do it. So far, I've been working on getting an cleaned-up sockets library working on both systems. (The original implementation was based on Claw.Sockets, which is too Windows-specific to use outright. NCSockets was the "portable" translation of that, but it never really was finished, which I'm doing now. Tero has already built most of a Debian 64-bit version of NCSockets, so I'm starting with that and the Claw.Sockets implementation. When done, Tero will have these on his website; and they'll be BSD-licensed, including the sample programs.) Randy.