From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: border1.nntp.ams3.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx05.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "J-P. Rosen" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Is this expected behavior or not Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:09:59 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: <1gnmajx2fdjju.1bo28xwmzt1nr.dlg@40tude.net> <3gv2jwc95otm.pl2aahsh9ox8.dlg@40tude.net> <1gkxiwepaxvtt$.u3ly33rbwthf.dlg@40tude.net> <1fmcdkj58brky.bjedt0pr39cd$.dlg@40tude.net> <1bj564vat3q1j$.1s4d00rlzx4ux$.dlg@40tude.net> <8bj2k30k7i19.w7ehsldwbf7x.dlg@40tude.net> <1o34nhpfuy6yl$.2orlukd1elr7.dlg@40tude.net> <1k6lte6wjoer9.1kwm2g83k3gwy$.dlg@40tude.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9a0d11e58ba588466424cad2fbc22465"; logging-data="4159"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19e6+5FoJILB55133mR8TN/" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130328 Thunderbird/17.0.5 In-Reply-To: <1k6lte6wjoer9.1kwm2g83k3gwy$.dlg@40tude.net> Cancel-Lock: sha1:xbvU+6HPpIdETGEkUbwgvEERkIM= X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 X-Original-Bytes: 2689 Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:181030 Date: 2013-04-12T11:09:59+02:00 List-Id: Le 12/04/2013 10:00, Dmitry A. Kazakov a écrit : > Ada 95 design was absolutely sound and correct in that respect. I am really > amazed that you and Randy propose to change that to unsafe and semantically > broken behaviour, in order to reduce amount of typing? Is it serious, or > just to counter me? I agree that the design is right, and I'm not proposing to change anything. I just said that the commonly accepted meaning of inheritence is specialization, where the upper level classes are more general and the lower ones are more specialized. I agree that inheritance has its own problems - that's why I use it rarely, I prefer composition. -- J-P. Rosen Adalog 2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00 http://www.adalog.fr