From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,556e5b18154df788 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.180.10.230 with SMTP id l6mr2787471wib.3.1365451620463; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:07:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: p18ni45336wiv.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.130.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.thorslund.org!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interresting, possibly buggy behavior in GNAT generics w/ expression function. Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 19:08:52 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <65330bfe-39e4-4f7b-85f5-e06e9458bf29@googlegroups.com> <85k3olb2w9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <2103bcbc-19e2-4fcf-bb16-5f41ac45ca97@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1365034143 26277 69.95.181.76 (4 Apr 2013 00:09:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2013 00:09:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Date: 2013-04-03T19:08:52-05:00 List-Id: "Adam Beneschan" wrote in message news:2103bcbc-19e2-4fcf-bb16-5f41ac45ca97@googlegroups.com... > On Tuesday, April 2, 2013 3:00:54 PM UTC-7, Randy Brukardt wrote: > >> The message I saw had no specification in it either, just some text >> describing the problem. There was no Ada code at all other than a one >> liner >> declaration of Image. > > If you still haven't seen it, this link should bring it up: > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.lang.ada/VW5bGBVN94g/8B26b3Dgq9QJ It looks like the first message I saw was Simon's reply to this -- I think they came up as separate threads for some reason and I never realized that this code has anything to do with the reply. Randy.