From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,556e5b18154df788 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.224.58.77 with SMTP id f13mr3527930qah.7.1365343649691; Sun, 07 Apr 2013 07:07:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: ef9ni13685qab.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!feeder3.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!news.n-ix.net!news.hufnagl.info!fu-berlin.de!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interresting, possibly buggy behavior in GNAT generics w/ expression function. Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:00:54 -0500 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <65330bfe-39e4-4f7b-85f5-e06e9458bf29@googlegroups.com> <85k3olb2w9.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1364940055 3441 69.95.181.76 (2 Apr 2013 22:00:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 22:00:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Original-Bytes: 2277 Date: 2013-04-02T17:00:54-05:00 List-Id: "Stephen Leake" wrote in message news:85k3olb2w9.fsf@stephe-leake.org... > "Randy Brukardt" writes: > >> "Adam Beneschan" wrote in message >> news:65330bfe-39e4-4f7b-85f5-e06e9458bf29@googlegroups.com... >> On Friday, March 29, 2013 6:04:28 PM UTC-7, Randy Brukardt wrote: >> >> ... >>>Randy, it looks to me that the original code called Image(...) only from >>>inside the >>>generic specification or body, not outside. >> >> OK, I didn't see that, because the OP I got only had a description of the >> spec in it, no code at all. > > The code is in function expressions in the spec; no body required. The message I saw had no specification in it either, just some text describing the problem. There was no Ada code at all other than a one liner declaration of Image. Randy.