From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,TO_NO_BRKTS_FROM_MSSP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,1cf653444208df72 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-10-04 06:16:25 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!supernews.com!telocity-west!TELOCITY!out.nntp.be!propagator-SanJose!news-in-sanjose!newsranger.com!www.newsranger.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada From: Ted Dennison References: <9pgr68$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu> Subject: Re: ada vs. cpp Message-ID: X-Abuse-Info: When contacting newsranger.com regarding abuse please X-Abuse-Info: forward the entire news article including headers or X-Abuse-Info: else we will not be able to process your request X-Complaints-To: abuse@newsranger.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 09:16:00 EDT Organization: http://www.newsranger.com Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 13:16:00 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13716 Date: 2001-10-04T13:16:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <9pgr68$7pu1@news.cis.okstate.edu>, David Starner says... > >Strings aren't Ada's strength, but Ada isn't terribly weak in strings. I >don't see any problem in parsing the input using Ada. Actually, if you don't mind using the Gnat-specific SNOBOL packages, Ada's string support is right up there with any scripting language. Even without it, it still beats C++. --- T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.