From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6aa6d133611419f5
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-29 10:57:12 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Thought this was interesting (Bounds Checking!)
Date: 29 Aug 2002 12:57:07 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <khdvyfAMxaiX@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <3D6688E1.3A1797CC@san.rr.com>
 <Z8Y99.5719$OD5.514319399@newssvr13.news.prodigy.com>
 <akdcc8$4ot$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <1030464758.505647@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <akgm8q$2gsa$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
 <nbRa9.29920$3V5.25137@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
 <wccznv8ynva.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <lC0b9.432$Y3.49485@news.xtra.co.nz>
 <_L0b9.434$Y3.52721@news.xtra.co.nz>
 <338040f8.0208280707.7f5ad9dd@posting.google.com>
 <3D6E561A.5080307@cogeco.ca>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1030642733 16736 192.135.80.34 (29 Aug 2002
 17:38:53 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 17:38:53 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:28567
Date: 2002-08-29T12:57:07-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <3D6E561A.5080307@cogeco.ca>, "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" <ve3wwg@cogeco.ca> writes:

> Now, where are all of those non-Ada programmers that think
> that bounds checking is unimportant? ;-)

I don't see what is important about bounds checking in this case.
It is only Windows that crashed :-)