From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,5164ccc41905b2d0
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.205.35.139 with SMTP id sw11mr671965bkb.2.1363060985301;
        Mon, 11 Mar 2013 21:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 g1ni60749wig.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!85.12.40.130.MISMATCH!xlned.com!feeder1.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-3.ams.xsnews.nl!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada and OpenMP
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:40:54 -0600
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <khdsu7$aoq$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: 
 <fbdb8bd7-be77-4338-90ba-0b0c212f121f@googlegroups.com><87k3pjht79.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org><hr-dnULuncyRjqTM4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
 <khb8m6$933$1@munin.nbi.dk><za6dnTU03LGyrqTM4p2dnAA@giganews.com>
 <khbm3h$f7f$1@munin.nbi.dk> <lya9qenyw9.fsf@pushface.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1362786056 11034 69.95.181.76 (8 Mar 2013 23:40:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 23:40:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Date: 2013-03-08T17:40:54-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Simon Wright" <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message 
news:lya9qenyw9.fsf@pushface.org...
> "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
>
>> you have to be able to remove redundant assertion checks to make the
>> cost cheap enough that they don't need to be left on all the time
>
> *off* all the time?

Yes, of course, sorry.

                        Randy.