From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0f6c37e3c1b712a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO? References: <1151405920.523542.137920@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1151413996.881418.65260@x69g2000cwx.googlegroups.com> <2418185.2jO2KLhFBO@linux1.krischik.com> <1151431127.2179.20.camel@localhost> <1151480714.730898.137230@d56g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> From: M E Leypold Date: 28 Jun 2006 15:07:48 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.72.226.55 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1151499691 88.72.226.55 (28 Jun 2006 15:01:31 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!news.germany.com!news.unit0.net!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5270 Date: 2006-06-28T15:07:48+02:00 List-Id: "Martin Krischik" writes: > Simon Wright wrote: > > Since the BCs don't use the non-standard pragma License (Licence?) the > > question doesn't arise. And given this discussion they are not going > > to. > > In the absence of pragma License GNAT scans the commens for magic words > which indicate the lincence used ;-) . As it is the BC will be > considered GMGPL by GNAT. But since no GNAT specific packages are used > no licence warnings are issued. If if there would be: I do not grok it: Linking GMGPL with GPL libraries should put the excutable under GPL, but the GMGPL part of the source would still be under GMGPL, wouldn't it? Why the license warnings then with GNAT specific units? Regards -- Markus