From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,6487f59679c615d8 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Received: by 10.180.95.97 with SMTP id dj1mr723109wib.4.1362276833404; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 18:13:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Path: bp2ni69216wib.1!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!194.109.133.83.MISMATCH!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!border4.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Reference Manual 2012 in info format Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 16:04:51 -0600 Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation Message-ID: References: <82aa1ud0l3.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <5449ce1a-cb98-45f5-8c09-3927dee713dc@googlegroups.com> <85liadjzv7.fsf@stephe-leake.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1361916294 19673 69.95.181.76 (26 Feb 2013 22:04:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:04:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Date: 2013-02-26T16:04:51-06:00 List-Id: "Robert A Duff" wrote in message news:wcchakzryys.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com... > "Nasser M. Abbasi" writes: ... >>...How does >> this relate to Ada being open/ISO/ANSI etc... standard? > > All of the copyright holders grant liberal permissions to > copy (read the part starting "This document may be copied..."). > That makes it pretty "open". You won't find that kind of > wording in (say) your favorite Robert Ludlum novel. Right. And more importantly, if we had just given the copyrights to ISO (which is the normal procedure), then the Standard would not be "open" in any practical sense: you'd have to pay ISO in order to distribute it (with some exceptions that have been created in recent years). As such, we've been keeping the ISO and original versions of the Standard separate, and maintaining the original "anyone may copy" wording. My understanding was that this was vetted by MITRE's lawyers back in the Corrigendum days (that's why the second set of wording is different than the first); I've maintained the same wording on more recent editions but we haven't rechecked if the "law" has changed significantly (I'm surely not a lawyer, either, other than for Ada :-). Randy.