From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3ebfb7ec7bfb06fa
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Received: by 10.180.8.4 with SMTP id n4mr1742754wia.0.1360469028062;
        Sat, 09 Feb 2013 20:03:48 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Path: 
 g1ni1983wig.0!nntp.google.com!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!193.141.40.65.MISMATCH!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!xlned.com!feeder7.xlned.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newspeer1.nac.net!border4.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nrc-news.nrc.ca!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.x-privat.org!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Passing indefinite types
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:56:37 -0600
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <kerrmb$j6d$1@munin.nbi.dk>
References: <5262a822-409a-4c79-a842-0e716527cb70@googlegroups.com>
 	<85ip696nlk.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 	<8d39b2ad-dc6c-4492-bc43-d2d01d748efa@googlegroups.com>
 <85r4ku52zz.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: static-69-95-181-76.mad.choiceone.net
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1360097804 19661 69.95.181.76 (5 Feb 2013 20:56:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 20:56:44 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157
Date: 2013-02-05T14:56:37-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Stephen Leake" <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> wrote in message 
news:85r4ku52zz.fsf@stephe-leake.org...
...
> I tried using Suppress:
>
>   pragma Suppress (Accessibility_Check, String_1);
>   pragma Suppress (Accessibility_Check, Sources);
>   pragma Suppress (Accessibility_Check, A);
>
> None of those helped; I'm not clear why not. Possibly because the
> failure is a legality issue, not a run-time check issue.

Correct: accessibility is a legality check in most cases. You could force it 
to be a dynamic check by using an anonynous-access-to-object type, and then 
you might be able to suppress the check (that's implementation-defined, of 
course, compilers are always allowed to make a check). Alternatively, just 
use 'Unchecked_Access and there is no accessibility check. (Of course, 
you're on your own at that point.)

                             Randy.